Podcasts: Towards flipping the classroom

May 7, 2012

I gave a brief presentation at a seminar organised by Professor Paul Lam of CLEAR at CUHK on 4th May 2012. The presentation was entitled, ‘Podcasts: Towards flipping the classroom’. The slides are on Slideshare. CLEAR have a webpage with the slides of all of the presentations.

For two, nearly three, years I have been creating podcasts to support my teaching of Land Law. Essentially, these podcasts are pre-recordings of the lectures and they are distributed well in advance of the lectures. They are accompanied by an e-book (more than lecture notes but currently not so detailed as a textbook) and a blog with outlines of the most important cases (and many others besides). Making the lecture recording and these other materials available in advance of the class means that one has to think about how to add value to the face to face session. I’m not brave enough to simply stop lecturing since I don’t know whether all of the students will have listened to the podcasts. The half-way approach is to break ‘the lecture’ down into a series of short lectures interspersed with time for clarification and for class discussion of relevant questions that have been distributed in advance. The questions and discussion should try to help students to get to grips with the central ideas and their application (and so should be a help in later tutorial discussions and in formal assessment). The blog (or other social media) can be used to continue this discussion after the class. In other words, learning is more goal-focused and (for the diligent) discussion can continue after the formal classroom time has ended without imposing a huge extra burden on the teacher. In this way, a group of ‘student experts’ can emerge with the ability to help their peers. Above all, using podcasts, ebooks and blogs facilitates deeper and more focused engagement with the knowledge and ideas that students need.

Revised version of the brief essay on fixtures

March 8, 2012

Here is the link to my brief essay on fixtures.

2011 in review

January 4, 2012

The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2011 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

A San Francisco cable car holds 60 people. This blog was viewed about 1,100 times in 2011. If it were a cable car, it would take about 18 trips to carry that many people.

Click here to see the complete report.

Article on Kerr v Baranow in Conveyancer and Property Lawyer

December 20, 2011

My commentary on the decision of the Canadian Supreme Court in Kerr v Baranow has just appeared (‘The constructive trust: from common intention to relationship? Kerr v Baranow’, [2011] Conveyancer and Property Lawyer 515 – 521). The judgment in Kerr looks at the use of unjust enrichment as a way of allocating rights in the assets of a ‘joint family venture’. The nature of the relationship between the co-habitees and the role of that relationship in improving the family’s balance sheet are central elements of the analysis. The article contrasts this approach with the use of the common intention constructive trust in England. It asks whether, despite the differences in approach between the two jurisdictions, there is evidence of convergence? After Stack, can it be said that the nature of the relationship between the parties (especially in its financial aspects) plays an important role in reaching a conclusion as to the ‘common intention’?

Article on Bruton in King’s Law Journal

December 14, 2011

My article ‘Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust: Opening Pandora’s Box’ has just appeared in King’s Law Journal ((2011) 22(3) King’s Law Journal 403 – 413) – click here to go to the Journal’s web-page). The article considers the possible legal bases for the House of Lords decision in this case. Lord Neuberger has recently stated that relativity of title supplies the explanation (Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford [2011] UKSC 52, para. 65). London & Quadrant’s possession could be seen as giving them a relative title out of which to carve a lease. Similarly, Mr. Bruton’s own possession could be seen as conferring relative title. This explanation would allow the outcome to be compatible with the traditional idea that the lease is always an estate in land. I argue, however, that Lord Hoffman was careful to reject the idea that Mr. Bruton had any title at all (relative or otherwise).

Podcasts in Higher Education

September 12, 2011

Here are the slides I used in a presentation to colleagues on 1st September 2011 about the use of podcasts in Higher Education. I explained how I have used podcasts in my teaching and why I did so. I have used podcasts to make sure that students can get a firm grasp of the basics as a platform for further and deeper study, reflection and engagement. There is also an impact or open access dimension (as illustrated by the 2010 slides showing the range of countries from which the talks in one of my podcast series have been downloaded). One of the participants asked whether I used Facebook and I showed the participants the Hong Kong Land Law Facebook page. The person who asked the questions was a colleague and an independent musician. He had recently publicised one of his concerts on his Facebook page and attracted an audience of 500.

Essay on the law of fixtures

April 15, 2011

I have just posted a brief essay on the law concerning fixtures to SSRN. Here is the link.

Akai case note

April 4, 2011

I have just posted a brief case note on Thanakharn Kasikorn Chamkat (Mahachon) v Akai Holdings Ltd ([2010] HKEC 1692, CFA). It is available on SSRN. Here is the link.

Reflections on teaching law

February 15, 2011

I have just written an essay with personal reflections on the nature of law teaching. It is available here.

Using podcasts to support students in a land law class

January 28, 2011

This is the paper we presented at ICEL in Penang in July 2010.

I’ve just uploaded it to SSRN and Bepress.

Here is the SSRN link

Here is the Bepress  link